Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Schwarm

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 2001No. 84,652PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by:

Wahl, S.J.:

A jury convicted Dr. Mark Schwarm, a licensed veterinarian, of 10 counts of distributing an anabolic steroid “other than for a medical purpose” in violation of the Kansas Uniform Controlled Substances Act (USCA), K.S.A. 65-4101 et seq.

Schwarm had been a duly licensed veterinarian since 1976, practicing in the City of South Hutchinson. Schwarm and his partner operated Associated Veterinary Services. Schwarm was the only practitioner licensed to dispense controlled substances in their practice of veterinary medicine. Winstrol-V is an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. HodgesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  2. United States v. Roy A. BarteeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. CominsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. United States v. Timothy Alden HayesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Shiva N. VarmaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API