Legal Opinion
ABI Investment Group v. FDIC
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided July 19, 1994No. Civ. 92-562-JDPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DiCLERICO, Chief Judge.
The plaintiffs, ABI Investment Group (“ABI”) and Robert S. Audley, brought an action against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in its capacity as receiver for the Hillsborough Bank and Trust and the Hills-borough Bank and Trust Company (“FDIC/Receiver”), in its corporate capacity (“FDIC/Corporate”), and against Banc One New Hampshire Asset Management Corporation (“BONHAM”). FDIC/Corporate has moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (document no. 21). For the following…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Valerie Watterson v. Eileen PageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- William R. Gooley v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Federal Express Corp. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1997
- DiGeronimo v. FDICDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998
- Nesbitt v. USA; GraffamDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1997