Legal Opinion

McGuckian v. Carpenter

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 24, 1920PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Assumpsit.

1Opinion of the CourtSweetland, C. J.

The first of the above entitled cases is an action in assumpsit to recover the amount due upon certain promissory notes given by the defendant, a minor, to the plaintiff in part payment upon the sale by the plaintiff to the defendant of a horse, wagon and harness. The second of the above entitled cases is an action in assumpsit to recover the sum paid in cash by the infant plaintiff in part payment for said horse, wagon and harness.

The cases were tried together before a justice of the Superior Court, sitting with a jury, and resulted in each-case in a verdict for said minor, Arthur H.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chandler v. SimmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  2. MacGreal v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Bartlett v. DrakeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. Price v. FurmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855
  5. McCarthy v. HendersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hamrick v. Hospital Service Corp. of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
  2. Amado v. Ken-Mac Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1955
  3. Warwick Municipal Employees Credit Union v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API