Legal Opinion

Fort Hall Water Users Ass'n v. United States

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1996No. 22163Published

1Opinion of the Court

921 P.2d 739 (1996)

129 Idaho 39

In re: SRBA Case No. 39576.

FORT HALL WATER USERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, State of Idaho, Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, and Twin Falls and North Side Canal Companies, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 22163.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, December 1995 Term.

July 5, 1996.

Rehearing Denied September 4, 1996.

Simms & Stein, P.A., Hailey, for appellant. Richard A. Simms argued.

Betty H. Richardson, United States Attorney, Boise; William B. Lazarus (argued), U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent United States of America.

Hon. Alan G.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miles v. Idaho Power Co. Ex Rel. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Orthman v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Boundary Backpackers v. Boundary CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Fort Hall Water Users Ass'n v. United StatesIdaho Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API