Legal Opinion
Frederick v. Calbio Pharmaceuticals
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 1979No. Civ. 53928PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POTTER, Acting P. J.
Plaintiffs Rose Ellen Frederick, Alan Frederick and Leslie Frederick appeal from the judgment dismissing their complaint against defendant Calbio Pharmaceuticals for damages for the wrongful death of William Frederick. The judgment was entered after defendant’s demurrer was sustained with 30 days’ leave to amend, and plaintiffs failed within that time to file an amended pleading.
The sole ground of demurrer was “[t]hat the complaint, and each and every cause of action thereof, is barred by the statute of limitations, namely, ¡Section 340(3) of the California Code of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Larcher v. WanlessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Mariann HOPKINS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DOW CORNING CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- McGowan v. University of ScrantonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Leaf v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.