Legal Opinion
Rhenalu v. Alcoa, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 19, 2002No. CIV.A.99-301-SLRPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Pechiney Rhenalu (“Pechiney”) filed this action against defendant Alcoa, Inc. (“Alcoa”) on May 12, 1999, seeking a declaratory judgment that its 2024A aluminum alloy product (“2024A alloy”) does not infringe Alcoa’s United States Patent No. 5,213,639 (the “ ’639 patent”) and that the ’639 patent is invalid, as well as seeking damages for Alcoa’s alleged tortious interference with Pechiney’s prospective business relations. 1 (D.I.l) On February 29, 2000, Alcoa filed a counterclaim asserting that the 2024A alloy infringes the ’639…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Honeywell International, Inc. v. Universal Avionics Systems Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2004
- Elite Licensing, Inc. v. Thomas Plastics, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003