Legal Opinion

Company v. Indiana Department of Workforce Development

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 2017No. Court of Appeals Case 93A02-1703-EX-650PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bradford, Judge.

Case Summary

Appellant Company appeals from-the determination that Claimant was an Employee- during the time she worked as a driver for Company, for purposes - of Indianá’s unemployment compensation system, as enacted in Indiana Code article 22-4 (“the Act”). Company’s business is the provision of driveaway services, focusing on the delivery of recreational vehicles (“RVs”) to dealerships on behalf of mánu-facturers. To that end, Company uses drivers it classifies as independent contractors, one of whom was Claimant during parts of 2014 and 2015. After no longer working for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Rowe v. New Hampshire Motor Transport Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Bond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Q.D.-A., Inc. v. Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Q. D.-A., Inc. v. Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Q. D.-A., Inc. v. Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Q. D.-A., Inc. v. Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API