Legal Opinion · Dissent
Dunn v. Chapman
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided February 18, 1929No. 12595Published
1Dissent
Mr. Acting Associate Justice Ramage
(dissenting): The complaint which is the subject of this appeal is as follows :
“Amended Compeaint
“The amended complaint of the above-named plaintiff, by leave of the Court had and obtained, respectfully shows to the Court:
“1. That the plaintiff is a resident and citizen of the county and state aforesaid, and on information and belief he alleges that the defendant H. M. Chapman and J. M. Abbott have been appointed and are now acting as receivers of Liberty Bank, a corporation created and existing under the laws of this State, with its principal place of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Van Weel v. WinstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Walker v. Queen Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Breedin v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Gem Chemical Co. v. Youngblood & CothranSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
- Prince v. State Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.