State v. McAllister
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: John P. Kavanattgh, Judge. En Banc. Statement by Mr. Justice Ramsey. The defendant, E. S. J. McAllister, was convicted of the crime against nature and from the sentence imposed he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ramsey
1. The defendant demurred to the indictment, alleging that it does not substantially conform to the requirements of Chapter 7 of .Title 8 of Lord’s Oregon Laws, in that it does not contain such specifications of the crime attempted to be charged and the particular circumstances thereof as required by said provisions, and that the facts stated do not constitute a crime.
The charging part of the indictment is in the following words: “The said E. S. J. McAllister, on the 28th day of October, 1912, in the county of Multnomah and the State of Oregon, then and there being, did, then and there,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Grignon's Lessee v. ASTORSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- State v. WhitneyOregon Supreme Court · 1879
- Commonwealth v. DillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Multnomah County v. SlikerOregon Supreme Court · 1881
- Keen v. KeenOregon Supreme Court · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. MorrisOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- State v. BouseOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. WestonOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- People v. AsavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- State v. WillsonOregon Supreme Court · 1925
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.