Maldonado v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
The offense was possession of more than four ounces of marihuana; the punishment, confinement for seven years and a fine of five thousand dollars.
Appellant’s sole ground of error is that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress and admitting marihuana into evidence at trial. He asserts that a warrantless search of the vehicle containing the marihuana violated his rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. The State in its brief avers only that appellant has no standing to contest the legality of the search.
The…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- State v. GuzmanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Crittenden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Hawkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Azeez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.