Legal Opinion
United States v. Cally
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 25, 2000No. 99-CV-5598PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
This case presents a unique situation; the Court has no address whatsoever to contact the pro se Defendant.
The Government commenced this action based on a delinquent student loan on September 9, 1999. The Government filed an affidavit of service, indicating that the Defendant was served on September 25, 1999, by leaving a copy of the summons and complaint with “Jane Cally,” allegedly a relative of the Defendant, at 91 Woodhull Landing, 'Sound Beach, N.Y. and mailing a copy of the summons to that address on September 28, 1999.
On January 31,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burgos v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Robert J. McNulty George G. Handgis, Franklin D. Roberts, John M. Shanklin and W.N. Thompson, John M. ShanklinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Davis v. MuslerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Triad Energy Corp. v. McNellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- United We Stand America, Inc. v. United We Stand, America New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arthur F. Williams, Inc. v. HelbigDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Smith v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020