Legal Opinion
Arthur F. Williams, Inc. v. Helbig
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 19, 2002No. 01-CV-4448 (ILG)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge.
SUMMARY
Plaintiffs Arthur F. Williams, Inc. (“Williams, Inc.”), Arthur F. Williams (“Arthur”), and Helen D. Williams (“Helen”) (collectively the “Williams plaintiffs” or the “plaintiffs”) move the Court, pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for a Default Judgment against defendants George Leonard Helbig (“George”) and Joanne Helbig (“Joanne”) (collectively the “Helbig defendants” or the “defendants”).1 For the reasons that follow, the motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
This ease arises out of matters concerning Old Harlem Fuel…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Enron Oil Corp. v. DiakuharaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Credit Lyonnais Securities (Usa), Inc. v. Rafael Alcantara and Cavelba, S.A., Doing Business as Casa De Bolsa Rafael Alcantara V.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Rotella v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- John F. Meehan and Robert W. Fink A/K/A Meehan & Fink v. John Snow and Judy SnowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pall Corp. v. Entegris, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Sea Hope Navigation Inc. v. Novel Commodities SADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Harriman v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- City of New York v. ADVENTURE OUTDOORS, INC.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- United States v. TellezDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.