Legal Opinion

Kuhl v. St. Bernard Rendering & Fertilizing Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 4, 1906No. 15,840PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Twenty-Ninth Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Bernard; Nemours Henry Núñez, Judge. Action by John ICuhl against the St. Bernard Rendering & Fertilizing Company and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

MONROE, J.

Plaintiff alleges that he is a taxpayer of the parish of St. Bernard, residing on Mehle street, and that the defendants, the St. Bernard Rendering & Fertilizing Company and Wm. L. Mehle, are maintaining a nuisance in his neighborhood, which makes his residence well nigh uninhabitable and life a burden to his family and himself, for this, to wit:

That said company operates a rendering •establishment, of which said Mehle is the owner and lessor, and also a rail or tram way extending from said establishment to and along Mehle street, and in front of petitioner’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago G. W. Ry. Co. v. First Methodist Episcopal Church of Leavenworth CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  2. Bradley v. PharrSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
  3. Herbert v. BensonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847
  4. Poydras v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1817

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Langlois v. Allied Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  2. Kentucky-Ohio Gas Co. v. BowlingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  3. Orton v. Virginia Carolina Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  4. Giardina v. Marrero Furniture Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  5. Morris v. PutsmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API