Territory of Hawaii v. Choy Dan
Hawaii Supreme Court
Reserved Question from Circuit Court, First Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
PERRY, J.
Defendant was charged with “having at Honolulu, City and County of Honolulu, Territory of Hawaii, during- one month last past, prior to and including August 30th, A. D. 1909, unlawfully and wilfully engaged- in carrying on a certain business, to wit, -a merchandise’business, by selling fresh fish at those certain stalls numbers 11,12 and 13 in the Honolulu Market in said City and County of Honolulu, without first obtaining a license for the carrying on of such business, he, the said Choy Dan, not being then and there a peddler of fish, fresh fruit or…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Dalton v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
- Hawaiian Airlines, Ltd. v. Public Utilities CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 1959
- Public Utilities Comm. v. Narimatsus.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1956
- Territory v. NarimatsuHawaii Supreme Court · 1956
- Dalton v. City of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1969