Legal Opinion

Doe v. The University of Mississippi

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided September 5, 2023No. 3:18-cv-00138Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION ANDREW DOE PLAINTIFF V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-138-DPJ-FKB THE UNIVERSITY OF DEFENDANTS MISSISSIPPI, ET AL. ORDER Plaintiff Andrew Doe claims that the University of Mississippi and other Defendants violated his rights when the University suspended him for sexual misconduct. Doe sues Defendants for gender discrimination under Title IX and asserts constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Both sides have moved for summary judgment. Defendants seek judgment on all claims; Doe seeks partial judgment on…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API