Duke Power Co. v. Mom 'N' Pops Ham House, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Judge.
Three questions are presented for review by this Court as follows:
1. Did the trial court’s rulings on the petitioner’s motion in limine and the respondents’ offer of evidence allow the jury improperly to consider possible specific further uses of the respondents’ property in reaching its verdict?
In condemnation proceedings, the determinative question is: In its condition on the day of taking, what was the value of the land for the highest and best use to which it would be put by owners possessed of prudence, wisdom and adequate means? The owner’s actual plans or hopes for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Carolina Power & Light Co. v. BowmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State Highway Commission v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Board of Transportation v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Wadsworth Land Co. v. Piedmont Traction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Webster v. PowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Carter v. Food Lion, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Peed v. PeedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- City of Charlotte v. CombsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Department of Transportation v. McDarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.