Legal Opinion
Sparano v. JLO Automotive, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 29, 2022No. 3:19-cv-00681Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT JAMES SPARANO, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:19-cv-00681 (VAB) JLO AUTOMOTIVE, INC., doing business as EXECUTIVE KIA, Defendant. RULING AND ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND MOTION TO AMEND TRIAL MEMO James Sparano (“Plaintiff”) has filed a motion in limine, seeking to preclude various types of evidence from introduction at trial. See Pl.’s Mot. in Lim., ECF No. 79 (Nov. 19, 2021) (“Pl.’s Mot. in Lim.”). JLO Automotive, Inc., doing business as Executive Kia (“JLO Automotive” or “Defendant”), has also filed three separate motions in limine, seeking to…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Trebor Sportswear Co., Inc. And Rotano Sportswear Co., Inc., Plaintiffs v. The Limited Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Townsend v. BENJAMIN ENTERPRISES, INC.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Manley v. Ambase Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Strubel v. Comenity BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.