Mueller v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of the district court for Dakota county, and from an order by Crosby, J., refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The complaint was the ordinary one in an action under the statute to determine adverse claims to real property in the actual possession of the plaintiffs. The answer alleged title in the defendants, and demanded judgment for the possession; being thus, in effect, a complaint in ejectment. Eastman v. Linn, 20 Minn. 387, (433.) The reply alleged facts entitling the plaintiffs to compensation for improvements, etc., under the “occupying claimants’ act,” in case the title should be found in defendants. The plaintiffs, in their ease in chief, to prove title in themselves, (which was the only…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Western Land Ass'n v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- McMurphy v. WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- Nelson v. Central Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
3Cited by11 opinions
- State ex rel. National Bond & Security Co. v. KrahmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Morrison v. Cottonwood Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1928
- Cruser v. WilliamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
- Stickney v. HughesWyoming Supreme Court · 1904
- Coulter v. StaffordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.