Legal Opinion

Royal Indemnity Co. v. Shull

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 15, 1984No. 65401PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKMAR, Judge.

This declaratory judgment action is essentially a suit between two insurance companies, with liability claimants as interested spectators. Plaintiff-Respondent Royal Indemnity Company issued a liability insurance policy to Hertz Rental Company, designed to provide insurance coverage for Hertz’s customers while they were driving automobiles rented from Hertz. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company, defendant-appellant, had issued an insurance policy to the father of Lawrence Feldman which would not provide coverage if the Hertz policy were found to provide coverage for Lawrence.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weathers v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1979

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Enterprise Leasing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. McPhee v. TuftyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Arthur Drinkall, Conservator of Dawn Drinkall v. Used Car Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Erie Insurance Group v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API