Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hendrickson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1996No. 407, 408, 409PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD ELLIOTT, Judge:

In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether Pennsylvania’s harassment by communication or address statute, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5504, is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 7 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. 1 We are also asked to decide whether the District Attorney of Allegheny County had jurisdiction to prosecute appellant under 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5504(a)(2) when the facsimile transmissions (faxes) forming the subject of the crime were sent from appellant’s office…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. Budd, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County2002
  3. Commission for Lawyer Discipline v. BentonTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Commission for Lawyer Discipline v. BentonTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API