Commonwealth v. Budd
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County
1Opinion of the Court
BIEHN, J.,
Defendants filed a pretrial challenge to the constitutionality of the Institutional Sexual Assault Statute. 18 Pa.C.S. §3124.2. They allege that the statute is void for vagueness and overbroad. They also challenge the lack of a mens rea requirement in the statute.
*65At the time of the alleged incidents, defendants Budd, McMullen, and Gilmore were employed as Bucks County correctional officers. Defendant Doyle was a Bucks County prison counselor. All of the defendants have been separately charged with institutional sexual assault. Defendant Budd was charged under the original Act and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. BuddSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003