Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lembke v. Unke

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1969No. 8486Published

1DissentKnudson, Judge

I dissent. I do not agree with the conclusion of the majority that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury.

It is well settled in this state that on an appeal from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict the question before this court is whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict. In re Hendricks’ Estate, 110 N.W.2d 417 (N.D.1961); Stormon v. Weiss, 65 N.W.2d 475 (N.D.1954); Keller v. Reichert, 49 N.D. 74, 189 N.W. 690 (1922).

The first family established the execution of the will by the two subscribing witnesses, Mr. Depuy and Mr. McEnroe, who were the only…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Iverson v. LancasterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Stormon v. WeissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  3. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. BroderickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Broadway & Ninety-Sixth Street Realty Co. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  5. Melland v. JohannesonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API