Legal Opinion
Service Wood Heel Co. v. Mackesy
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 11, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is a suit by a manufacturer of wood heels to enjoin the defendants, officers and members of the United Shoe and Leather Workers Union, from doing acts to prevent sales by the plaintiff to shoe manufacturers. The case was referred to a master, whose report contains the facts. No appeal was taken from an interlocutory decree confirming the report. The bill was filed July 18, 1934, and the master's report was dated August 1, 1934. The case is here on appeal from a final decree entered October 6, 1934, dismissing the bill with costs. The pertinent facts as found by the master are these:…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pickett v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Berry v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Beekman v. MarstersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Burnham v. DowdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- A. T. Stearns Lumber Co. v. HowlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ferrick v. BarryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Walter v. McCarvelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Yankee Network, Inc. v. GibbsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Keegan v. O'DonnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Tompkins v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.