Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Groomer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 2, 1959No. 18527PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

We refer to the parties by name. Erickson, the Groomers and Ehrenkrook all owned lots in close proximity to each other, located in the Town or City of Westminster; all of the lots had been zoned “A-Residential District” which zoning did not permit the construction of apartment houses. Prior to the filing of this action, the defendant in error, the Board of Adjustment, had granted variances authorizing Erickson to construct a “14-unit multi dwelling” on his lots and authorizing Ehrenkrook to construct a “24-unit structure and 24-unit carport” on his lots. Prior to the filing of this action,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Windsor v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. People ex rel. Arkansas Valley Sugar Beet & Irrigated Land Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  3. Board of Adjustment of Adams County v. IwerksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Town of Nottingham v. Lee Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. Renner v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  3. Westwood Meat Market, Inc. v. McLucasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  4. City of Englewood v. RichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API