Legal Opinion
State v. Juarez
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 27, 2003No. 19547-3-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
64 P.3d 83 (2003)
115 Wash.App. 881
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Jacobo Cedillo JUAREZ, Appellant.
No. 19547-3-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Six.
February 27, 2003.
Dan K. Connolly, Okanogan, WA, for Appellant.
Karl F. Sloan, Okanogan, WA, for Respondent.
SWEENEY, J.
A criminal defendant cannot be put in jeopardy twice for the same offense. U.S. CONST. amend. V; WASH. CONST. art. I, § 9. And jeopardy attaches when a jury is selected and sworn. State v. Rich, 63 Wash. App. 743, 747, 821 P.2d 1269 (1992).
Here, compelling discovery violations by the State left insufficient…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. StrineWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State Of Washington, Res. v. Alexander Martin Scordamaglia, App.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State Of Washington, V Richard Alan Lucas, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020