Legal Opinion

People v. Adams

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1959No. Crim. 6618PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Defendant was convicted of five charges of fraudulently issuing a check without sufficient funds in the bank to meet the same, thus violating section 476a, Penal Code. Granted probation, he appeals from that order (Pen. Code, § 1237, subd. 1), and from an order denying his motion for new trial. Counsel makes two points, insufficiency of the evidence and error in finding defendant guilty upon all five counts. There is no merit in either contention.

In testing the first argument we “must assume in favor of the [finding] the existence of every fact which the [court] could have reasonably deduced…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. People v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. Tom WooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. People v. BercovitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CoburnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  2. People v. GreenwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. People v. HainesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. State of Iowa v. Kamie Jo SchieboutSupreme Court of Iowa · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API