Legal Opinion
Excelsior College v. Frye
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 1, 2009No. 07-55997Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Defendant Charles M. Frye appeals several aspects of the district court’s judgment against him following a jury trial on Plaintiff Excelsior College’s (“Excelsior”) claims of copyright infringement and trade secret misappropriation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We conclude that the district court properly granted partial summary judgment in favor of Excelsior and did not abuse its discretion in ruling on the post-trial and pre-trial motions now challenged by Frye. We affirm.
The facts of the case are known to the parties, and we do not repeat them below.
Frye argues…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carrie Tritchler v. The County of Lake, the Superior Court in and for the County of Lake, and Lee B. PooleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- David Enlow v. Salem-Keizer Yellow Cab Co., Inc., an Oregon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Columbia Pictures Television, Inc. v. Krypton Broadcasting of Birmingham, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Idaho Watersheds Project v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Linda D. Eales and Eales & Associates, Inc. v. Environmental Lifestyles, Inc., an Arizona Corporation Michael ShoteyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.