State v. Ford
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
By his first assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial judge erred in refusing to review certain evidence at the jury’s request after it had begun its deliberation. It appears from the record that after deliberating for several hours, the jury returned to the courtroom whereupon the following exchange took place:
COURT: All right, ladies and gentlemen, I understand you have a question.
FOREMAN: Your Honor, we would like answered —we can’t remember which time did each man, Barbee and Ford, sign his rights and on what date was this, and what time did the detectives go…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Calloway v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. SweezySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. AsheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. BrogdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. LangSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. BarrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.