Let's Go Aero, Inc. v. Cequent Performance Products, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RAYMOND P. MOORE, United States District Judge
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Cequent Performance Products, Inc.’s (“Cequent”) motion to set aside the default entry (ECF No. 42) and its motion to compel arbitration (ECF No. 29).
For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to set aside the default entry and GRANTS, in part, Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration.
I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
In 2008, Defendant and Plaintiff Let’s Go Aero, Inc. (“Let’s Go Aero” or “LGA”) entered into a license agreement (“License Agreement”) that permitted…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gillman v. GillmanUtah Supreme Court · 2021
- Arguello v. Water Resources Group, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2020
- Stanek Holdco, Inc. v. Water Resources GroupDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020