Legal Opinion

Betoney v. Union Pacific Railroad

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 1984No. 82CA0727PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STERNBERG, Judge.

The plaintiff, Gilbert Betoney, was employed by the defendant, Union Pacific Railroad, as a laborer on a “system gang” which performed work on sections of railroad track throughout the railroad system. Late in the evening of November 15, 1978, Betoney was returning from a bar to a bunk car on which the system gang slept in the railroad yard in Rawlins, Wyoming. Betoney, in an admittedly intoxicated state, attempted to cross between two railroad cars of a moving train, slipped and fell between the cars, and was injured. His right leg was amputated at the knee as a result of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Erie Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Mostyn v. Delaware, L. & WR Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  4. Orie W. Davis v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  5. Morris v. Pennsylvania R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Felton v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Johnson v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Holsapple v. Union Pacific R. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Leef v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API