Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Haynie

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 4, 1982No. 80-574PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this malicious prosecution action the jury returned a verdict in the amount of $12,000.00 for plaintiff John B. Johnson (Johnson) against Bobby R. Haynie (Haynie) and the Ampex Corporation (Ampex). The trial court granted defendants' motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative a new trial. We reverse the trial court's grant of a JNOV, but affirm its grant of a new trial.

In October 1978 a tool box was taken from the office of David Settle (Settle), a laboratory supervisor at the Ampex plant in Opelika, Alabama. Settle notified Haynie, employment supervisor at the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Union Indemnity Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Alabama Power Co. v. NeighborsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Birwood Paper Company v. DamskySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  4. Brown v. ParnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  5. Skeffington v. EylwardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ritch v. WaldropSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Cutts v. American United Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. McMillan, Ltd. v. WARRIOR DRILLING & ENG.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Kitchens v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  5. Smith v. Wendy's of the South, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API