Legal Opinion

Smith v. Wendy's of the South, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 20, 1987No. 85-990PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

At the close of plaintiff Smith's malicious prosecution case, the trial court granted a directed verdict for the defendants, Wendy's of the South, Inc., and Robert Harland Matthews. Smith appeals. We affirm.

Smith was indicted by the Grand Jury of Mobile County for a robbery in the first degree at a Wendy's restaurant. The criminal proceedings were nol-prossed by the district attorney.

A directed verdict in favor of a defendant is proper only when there is no evidence to support one or more elements of plaintiff's cause of action. Smith v. Norman, 495 So.2d 536 (Ala. 1986).

As this Court stated…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nat. SEC. Fire & Cas. Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. FordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Union Indemnity Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Alabama Power Co. v. NeighborsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Herston v. WhitesellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Eidson v. Olin Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Benjamin v. Hooper Electronic Supply Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Garner v. HickmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Montgomery v. City of MontgomeryCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  5. Eubanks v. HallCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API