Bridges v. Paige
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Fifth District. For case see opinion. The pleadings were verified. Plaintiffs had judgment, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
Terry, C. J. concurring.
This suit was brought as on a quantum valebant, for professional services as Attorneys. The complaint claimed, among other charges, a sum of money due for the conduct of a suit of Paige v. O’Neill. The answer denied the value of the services as charged. *641The defendant proposed to show by a witness—one of the plaintiffs—that they did not perform the legal services rendered by them in the case of Paige v. O’Neill with ordinary care, diligence, or reasonable skill, but that'they performed said services negligently and unshillfully, and_ that, by reason of such…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Goble v. DillonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Daly v. LiningerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
- Interstate Group Administrators, Inc. v. Cravens, Dargan & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Beverly Hospital v. EarlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Foltz v. CogswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.