Duggan v. Tarbutton
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
It is the rule that one partner may sue another at law on a cause of action growing out of the partnership business, where there has been a settlement of the partnership affairs, and a balance struck, that is, where the affairs of the partnership have been so settled that a jury can, without an equitable accounting, ascertain the balance justly due by one partner to the other. Poole v. Perdue, 44 Ga. 454; Paulk v. Creech, 8 Ga. App. 738 (70 S. E. 145). The theory of this rule is that such a liquidation of the claims against and liabilities to the partnership renders the balance struck in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Paulk v. CreechCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Pool v. PerdueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
- Benton v. HunterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tarbutton v. DugganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Gunter v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932