Legal Opinion

Duggan v. Tarbutton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 19, 1927No. 18050PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

It is the rule that one partner may sue another at law on a cause of action growing out of the partnership business, where there has been a settlement of the partnership affairs, and a balance struck, that is, where the affairs of the partnership have been so settled that a jury can, without an equitable accounting, ascertain the balance justly due by one partner to the other. Poole v. Perdue, 44 Ga. 454; Paulk v. Creech, 8 Ga. App. 738 (70 S. E. 145). The theory of this rule is that such a liquidation of the claims against and liabilities to the partnership renders the balance struck in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Paulk v. CreechCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  2. Pool v. PerdueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
  3. Benton v. HunterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tarbutton v. DugganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  2. Gunter v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API