State v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIDEL, Judge.
A question of contract interpretation arises in the context of a criminal appeal. In a plea agreement the parties provided that Tracy Shane Taylor, the defendant-appellant, would “be jointly and severally liable [with a co-defendant, not a party to this appeal] to pay restitution in an amount not greater than $30,000.” Did the parties thereby fix restitution at $30,000, beyond challenge by the defendant? Or did they merely place a $30,000 ceiling on defendant’s restitution exposure, leaving defendant free to challenge any claimed amount in a restitution hearing before the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. William John Sutton, United States of America v. Freddie Goldbaum Ortiz, United States of America v. Valentine Frank ProitteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Jane ReadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Goodman v. Newzona Investment Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Shattuck v. Precision-Toyota, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. LackNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- State v. FancherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- State v. ScrogginsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- State v. CampoyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.