Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 1, 1988No. 1 CA-CR 11895PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIDEL, Judge.

A question of contract interpretation arises in the context of a criminal appeal. In a plea agreement the parties provided that Tracy Shane Taylor, the defendant-appellant, would “be jointly and severally liable [with a co-defendant, not a party to this appeal] to pay restitution in an amount not greater than $30,000.” Did the parties thereby fix restitution at $30,000, beyond challenge by the defendant? Or did they merely place a $30,000 ceiling on defendant’s restitution exposure, leaving defendant free to challenge any claimed amount in a restitution hearing before the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. William John Sutton, United States of America v. Freddie Goldbaum Ortiz, United States of America v. Valentine Frank ProitteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. Jane ReadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Goodman v. Newzona Investment Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Shattuck v. Precision-Toyota, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. LackNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. State v. FancherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. State v. ScrogginsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. State v. CampoyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API