Legal Opinion
Monroe Beverage Co. v. Stroh Brewery Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided June 2, 1995No. Docket 157059PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarilyn Kelly, P.J.
Defendant, The Stroh Brewery Company, appeals by leave granted from the denial of a motion for partial summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8). On appeal, Stroh asserts that the trial court erred in concluding that plaintiff, Monroe Beverage Company, Inc., had standing to pursue a cause of action against Stroh under the provisions of MCL 436.30b et seq.; MSA 18.1001(2) et seq. It also challenges the constitutionality of MCL 436.30b; MSA 18.1001(2). We affirm._
i
The underlying facts are not in dispute. In 1984, Stroh and Cap Beverage, Inc. entered into a "Wholesaler Agreement.” Under…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Marquis v. Hartford Accident & IndemnityMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Bundo v. City of Walled LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sills v. Oakland General HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Reed Dairy Farm v. Consumers Powers Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Monroe Beverage Co. v. Stroh Brewery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Tyler v. Livonia Public SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Monroe Beverage Co. v. Stroh Brewery Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.