Lindsay v. Housing Authority
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.
The appellants are aggrieved because the valuation set by the circuit court is based upon the opinion evidence presented by two expert witnesses. The trial court “substantially discounted” the valuation asserted by the appellants themselves. The latter based their opinion as to value upon the original purchase price plus the cost of improvements.
The appellants purchased a land-contract interest in the property for $5,000 on May 8, 1956. A duplex was located upon the property, but at the time of the purchase it was not in habitable condition. It had been condemned by the city health…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Watson v. Milwaukee & Madison Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Patch v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- State ex rel. Evansville Mercantile Ass'n v. City of EvansvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- State Ex Rel. Enterprise Realty Co. v. SwiderskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Epstein v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Hazelton v. DaughertyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Starer v. Milwaukee General Insurance Agency, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Symms v. CollierIdaho Supreme Court · 1969