Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Haley

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 21, 2001No. 99-6087PublishedCited by 310 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUBINA, Circuit Judge:

The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”) requires, inter alia, that a prisoner bringing a civil action in forma pauperis (“IFP”) must pay the full filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b) (West Supp. 2000). The issue presented in this appeal is whether multiple prisoners, proceeding IFP, are entitled to join their claims and thus pro-rate the mandatory filing fees among the group instead of individually paying the full fee. We conclude that the intent of Congress in promulgating the PLRA was to deter frivolous civil actions brought by prisoners by requiring each…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Mitchell v. FarcassCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Lee Hampton v. Ron HobbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. Debro S. Abdul-Akbar v. Roderick R. MckelvieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by310 opinions

  1. William A. Dupree v. R. W. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Hagan v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  3. Souvannaseng Boriboune v. Gerald BergeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Charles D. Wilson, Sr. v. George SargentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  5. Bryant S. Troville v. Greg VenzCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

305 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API