Legal Opinion

Hedden v. Hedden

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1870PublishedCited by 4 opinions

This cause came on for final hearing, upon the pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The hill states that the complainant was married to the defendant, liis wife, in Uewark, June 13tli, 1864; that he was under twenty, and she eighteen years of age; that he was compelled by the father of the defendant to marry her, on account of his previous illicit intercourse with her, which *62liad come to the knowledge of her father; that after the ceremony he never lived with her, or had any connection with her; that a child was born about four months after the marriage.

That at some time not specified, after the marriage, he discovered that she had been guilty of illicit…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Todd v. Policemen's, Etc., Fund of City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Pike v. PikeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  3. Arnaboldi v. ArnaboldiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  4. W. v. W.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API