Legal Opinion · Dissent

State of Minnesota, Department of Jobs and Training v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 17, 1989No. 87-5346Published

1Dissent

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge,

joined by LAY, Chief Judge, HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting.

Is it willful disobedience of the law to rely on a reported opinion of a United States District Court, merely because an administrative agency thinks the Court was wrong? This Court today answers that question in the affirmative. I respectfully dissent.

There is little to add to my opinion dissenting from the decision of the panel. State of Minnesota, Department of Jobs and Training v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 858 F.2d 433, 437 (8th Cir.1988). I am willing to assume for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Johnson v. CushingDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1980
  3. State of Minnesota, Department of Jobs and Training v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API