People v. Jagotka

Taylor, Corrigan, and Young, JJ.

(concurring). The defendant persuaded the district court to suppress the result of a blood test that was taken to determine whether he had been driving while intoxicated. The circuit court reversed the suppression order. The Court of Appeals affirmed the circuit court, except that it directed that the defendant receive the benefit of a special jury instruction. We reverse in part the *276judgment of the Court of Appeals and affirm the judgment of the circuit court.

i

Defendant Michael J. Jagotka was arrested in March 1995 by an officer who suspected that he had been…