Legal Opinion
Edwards v. Thermigen LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 27, 2024No. 3:21-cv-01828Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SHARON DE EDWARDS, Case No. 21-cv-01828-JSC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: MOTION FOR 9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 THERMIGEN LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 95 Defendant. 11 12 13 Plaintiff Sharon de Edwards, MD, sues Thermigen for fraudulently marketing and selling a 14 medical device as approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a treatment for 15 menopausal symptoms. (Dkt. No. 63.)1 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for summary 16 judgment on all her claims. (Dkt. No. 95.) Having carefully considered the briefing, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Casa Herrera, Inc. v. BeydounCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Alling v. Universal Manufacturing Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- United States for Use and Benefit of Dennie Reed, Dba Dennie Reed & Sons, Inc. v. C.E. Callahan, Dba C.E. Callahan Co., Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellee v. Esto, Inc., Formerly Known as H.A. Ekelin & Assoc. United Pacific Insurance Company Reliance Insurance Co., Defendants-Cross-Claimants-Appellants. United States for Use and Benefit of Dennie Reed, Dba Dennie Reed & Sons, Inc. v. C.E. Callahan, Dba C.E. Callahan Co., Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant v. Esto, Inc., Formerly Known as H.A. Ekelin & Assoc. United Pacific Insurance Company Reliance Insurance Co., Defendants-Cross-Claimants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Addax Energy SA v. M/V Yasa H. MullaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.