Legal Opinion

Cespedes v. HBC Florida, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 29, 2000No. 3D00-1214Published

1Per curiam

As the trial court concluded, there was no competent evidence that liability could be imposed on the appellee on the sole asserted basis that it was engaged in a joint enterprise with the active tortfeasor. See Kislak v. Kreedian, 95 So.2d 510 (Fla.1957); Russell v. Thielen, 82 So.2d 143 (Fla.1955); Metric Engineering v. Gonzalez, 707 So.2d 354 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), review denied, 718 So.2d 169 (Fla.1998); Florida Tomato Packers, Inc. v. Wilson, 296 So.2d 536 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 327 So.2d 32 (Fla.1976). The judgment for the defendant entered on a directed verdict in its favor is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kislak v. KreedianSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Florida Tomato Packers v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. Russell v. ThielenSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  4. Metric Engineering, Inc. v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API