Legal Opinion

The Oceana

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 21, 1916PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Admiralty. Consolidated suits to enforce maritime liens against the Steamship Oceana; the Morse Dry Dock Company, claimant. On exceptions to report of special commissioner.

1Opinion of the Court

VENDER, District Judge.

This is a consolidated action embracing 69 libels asserting maritime liens aggregating $43,289.93 against the steamship Oceana, of which the Morse Dry Dock & Repair Company appears as claimant. For convenience of reference the number given each lien claim in the special commissioner’s report is added to the lienor’s name in the list of appearances of counsel, and the various lienors are hereafter referred to by number. All the claims are for repairs, supplies, or other necessaries, within the meaning of the Act of June 23, 1910 (36 Stat. 604), relating to liens on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. The KateSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. New York Trust Co. v. Bermuda-Atlantic S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1913
  3. The City of MilfordDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1912
  4. Black Diamond Coal-Min. Co. v. The H. C. GradyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1898
  5. The Ha HaDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re J. C. Wilson & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
  2. National Surety Co. v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
  3. International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. v. Park Ventures, Inc., and W. Anthony Lusk Darrell Kenneth Kinsey O/s Donald E, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. The MuskegonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921
  5. James Tregarthen & Sons Co. v. Forsythe Bros.District Court, E.D. New York · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API