Legal Opinion

Elmhurst Packers, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 29, 1941No. Civ. 11804PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate to compel the dismissal of an action for failure to bring it to trial within five years. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 583.)

An action for breach of a contract for the sale of frozen peas was filed on April 28, 1936, and summons served on defendant, petitioner herein, on April 30, 1936. A demurrer to the complaint, served on or about May 27, 1936, was sustained with leave to amend. On or about June 9, 1937, an amended complaint was served and filed and a stipulation entered into between the parties that defendant should have ten days from and after written notice…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Christin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Andersen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Romero v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court of Tuolumne Cty.California Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Woley v. TurkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. General Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Knight v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Flamer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API