Legal Opinion

Muncy v. G.C.R., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 7, 2004No. 03-5511PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.

The defendant/cross-claimant-appellant G.C.R., Inc., (“GCR”) has contested the *553district court’s judgment of dismissal, without prejudice, of all claims and cross-claims herein, for failure to prosecute. The plaintiff/cross-defendant-appellee Billy R. Muncy (“Muncy”), doing business as the Woodlake Golf Course located in Claiborne County, Tennessee (“Woodlake” or “the golf course”), has not contested the district court’s judgment.1

The underlying lawsuit, a diversity breach of commercial contract action, germinated out of disputes engendered by the construction of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Muhammad v. CloseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Shepard Claims Service, Inc. v. William Darrah & Associates, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Gulnara Gafurova v. Matthew WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. Al-amin v. State of TennesseeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021
  3. Alshimary 342578 v. Unknown Party 1District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024
  4. Angel Amaniyah Love v. Synchrony BankDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2026
  5. Baxter v. Core CivicDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API