Fox v. Holcomb
Michigan Supreme Court
xippeal in Chancery from Gratiot Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
G-bates, Ch. J:
Tbe defendants maintain a dam on Pine River at St. Louis, which sets the water back on certain lands of which complainants claim to be owners. The height of the dam is practically increased somewhat by slash-boards. Complainants maintained that the setting bade the water on their lands was without right, was injurious to health, and caused damage to their lands. The cause was heard on pleadings and proofs, and the court decreed that defendants should be perpetually restrained after April 1, 1875, from flowing the parcel of Mrs. Luce, so far as caused by the slash-boards, and…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Koseris v. JR Simplot CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
- Roy v. Chevrolet Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Bailey v. CulverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Beaverton Power Co. v. Wolverine Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Domboorajian v. WoodruffMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.