Legal Opinion
Globe Solvents Co. v. the California
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 21, 1948No. 9221PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
Appellee instituted a Libel in Rem in the Court below seeking to recover for damages to a cargo of lacquer solvent shipped from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to San Diego, California. The portion of the shipment here involved1 consisted of seven hundred seven cases, each containing two five gallon cans. Appellee shipped the seven hundred seven cases of solvent, having first attached thereto a “Red Label” thus automatically classifying the same as inflammable. The Dock Receipt shows same received for shipment as a “Red Label” cargo.2 Appellee made no special arrangements…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Waterman S. S. Corp. v. United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- The AnacondaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Pioneer Import Corporation v. the LafcomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- A. J. Tower Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Crist v. United States War Shipping AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. v. Ss Hong Kong Producer, Her Engines, Etc., and Universal Marine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- A. M. Collins & Co. v. Panama R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Fireman's Ins. Co. of Newark, NJ v. Gulf Puerto Rico Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1972
- Petition of United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- PPG Industries, Inc. v. Ashland Oil Co.-Thomas Petroleum Transit DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.