Legal Opinion
Orr v. Interstate Commerce Commission
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided November 17, 1988No. 86-2874-GAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AFFIRMING DECISION OF ICC AND GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GIBBONS, District Judge.
Petitioners in this case, James B. Orr (Orr) and Highway Express, Inc. (Highway), request a review of the decision of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) that found their attempt to collect “undercharges” from Sewell Plastics, Inc. (Sewell) to be an “unreasonable practice.” The petitioners have asked this court to reconsider the decision based on the assertion that the ICC cannot administratively change the long-standing “filed rate doctrine.” After considering the briefs of all parties in this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Maislin Industries, U.S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Orr v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Orr v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Still v. Salem Carpet Mills, Inc. (In re Southwest Equipment Rental, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1989