Colson v. Pelgram
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The appointment of a trustee to fill a vacancy caused by the death of one of two trustees is the principal question involved in this controversy. To decide that question it is necessary to construe the “ tenth ” clause of the will of Eliza M. Pelgram, which reads as follows: “ I nominate, constitute and appoint my brother, George H. Balleray, and my son, Charles R. Pelgram, Executors and Trustees of this my last Will and Testament and of the trust therein contained, and direct that they shall not be required to give bonds, either in the State of New York or elsewhere. On the death,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lawrence v. . LittlefieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Matter of RunkNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Bronson v. BronsonNew York Supreme Court · 1874
- Colson v. FlemingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Colson v. PelgramNew York Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re ColsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- In re the Estate of JanowitzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- In re the Estate of FishmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1982